So Manjaro has become pretty much a plate of spaghetti. The bigger concern is that they immediately include 4 or 5 completely different package managers: pacman, pamac, Flatpack, Snapd, and a GUI version depending on the DE you're using, and then you need yay (used to be yaourt) to access the AUR repository.
![manjaro vs arch manjaro vs arch](https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-87_IKjznrXk/WTF72fNswoI/AAAAAAAA3qo/_of_dK6LWdcjpYpHf5YoAqB3cu0XWKs3gCLcB/s1600/osx-arc%2Bon%2BManjaro%2B.png)
![manjaro vs arch manjaro vs arch](https://i.redd.it/u9cowro5lwv01.png)
Arguably be the best desktop distro with lts kernel. If I went the Manjaro Architect route, then I would probably had the stablest system ever.
MANJARO VS ARCH SOFTWARE
It’s not HW issues, it’s breakages due to the opinionated defaults that Manjaro put in place for their flagship isos and base skels. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side. You can still uninstall it, so no problem. Manjaro is an Arch-based distribution with all the benefits of the Arch ecosystem and community but with the added benefit of being much more user-friendly than Arch.The overall features it provides is hard to beat. All that aside I am using both, Arch linux and Manjaro and must say that Arch is slightly more stable for me than Manjaro. I mostly dont care about the distro, After bringing back my dot files. They pre-package it with Steam, which probably most people don't even need, and Steam is major spyware on its own. For bleeding edge and non productive arch or manjaro if you are a beginner is fine. Manjaro puts quite a lot of bloatware out of the box which I really don't like.
MANJARO VS ARCH MANUAL
Providing all the benefits of cutting-edge software combined with a focus on getting started quickly, automated tools to require less manual intervention, and help readily available when needed, Manjaro is suitable for both newcomers and experienced computer users. When it comes to PC, Manjaro is indeed the more user friendly one while Arch is the one that's less bloated. Manjaro is an accessible, friendly, and open-source operating system. Though I wouldn't think so considering that an ARM version of Arch has been around for 2 decades already, so all you need to do is to pre-package it with the right kernel, PinePhone specific drivers, and slap Phosh on top, and you've got Arch running on a PinePhone.
![manjaro vs arch manjaro vs arch](https://www.fosslinux.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Manjaro-vs.-Arch-Linux.png)
My understanding is that Manjaro ARM is made by the Manjaro team themselves while the Arch build is just an unofficial port by the community, so there might be some minor differences in the case of the PinePhone.